<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<title>Latest posts in: When did being “unhinged” become a valid content strategy?</title>
		<link>https://worldschoolface.com/index.php/forum/rss/?thread=2238</link>
		<description>Latest forum posts on: World School Face</description>
		<item>
			<title>When did being “unhinged” become a valid content strategy?</title>
			<link>https://worldschoolface.com/index.php/forum/general-2/when-did-being-8220unhinged-8221-become-a-valid-content-strategy/?post=2535</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>It seems like acting chaotic online isn&rsquo;t even accidental anymore&mdash;it&rsquo;s intentional branding. The more unfiltered and outrageous someone is, the more engagement they get.</p>

<p>I came across some solid writing on online storytelling at <strong><a href="https://www.bigwritehook.co.uk/" target="_new">https://www.bigwritehook.co.uk/</a></strong> and then fell into a rabbit hole on <strong><a href="https://www.influencersgonewildco.uk/" target="_new">https://www.influencersgonewildco.uk/</a></strong>.</p>

<p>Do you think audiences actually prefer this type of content, or have platforms trained us to reward extremes?</p>]]></description>
			<guid>https://worldschoolface.com/index.php/forum/general-2/when-did-being-8220unhinged-8221-become-a-valid-content-strategy/?post=2535</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2026 16:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>dougla srozek</dc:creator>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>